Keyword summary
31% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cornell University results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 642 hits . Analysis detected 4,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,292 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,911 of 37,536 keywords). This Cornell University is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Cornell University
Keyword details
Total words: 8,292
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst