Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Continental Army results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hindsight Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 2,016 hits . Analysis detected 11,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,744 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,006 of 37,536 keywords). This Continental Army is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Continental Army
Keyword details
Total words: 11,744
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst