Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlton Allen results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 988 hits . Analysis detected 6,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,673 of 6,628 authors). This Charlton Allen is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Charlton Allen
Author details
Total words: 5,972
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst