Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Staffers results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 6,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,018 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Staffers is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Congressional Staffers
Keyword details
Total words: 3,624
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.6% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.5% 20.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst