Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colorectal Cancer results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,811 hits. Analysis detected 12,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,600 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,648 of 37,536 keywords). This Colorectal Cancer is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Colorectal Cancer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
53%Colorectal Cancer (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,600
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate