Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cocaine Trafficking results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 780 hits. Analysis detected 4,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,153 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,238 of 37,536 keywords). This Cocaine Trafficking is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Cocaine Trafficking
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Cocaine Trafficking (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,153
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.3%10.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate