Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Persecution results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 3,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 810 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (641 of 35,982 keywords). This Christian Persecution is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Christian Persecution
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
99%Christian Persecution (selected)17%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 810
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

98% percentile
025507510098.2% percentile
16.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles810 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 53.8%53.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 52.8%52.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 38.8%38.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 31.7%31.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 29.1%29.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 24.1%24.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 36.4%36.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Keyword 53.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 52.8%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 38.8%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Keyword 36.4%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 31.7%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos