Keyword summary
82%6 analyzed articles/videos2,992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chatbots results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 2,896 hits. Analysis detected 17,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,668 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,500 of 37,536 keywords). This Chatbots is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Chatbots
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
49%Chatbots (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate