Keyword summary
90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catalyst results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 1,012 hits. Analysis detected 6,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,727 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (14,884 of 36,203 keywords). This Catalyst is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Catalyst
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
59%Catalyst (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,727
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos