Keyword summary
40% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casper City Council results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 388 hits . Analysis detected 2,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,008 of 37,536 keywords). This Casper City Council is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Casper City Council
Keyword details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst