Keyword summary
77%4 analyzed articles/videos2,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carolina Hurricanes results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 2,318 hits. Analysis detected 13,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,623 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (11,204 of 34,637 keywords). This Carolina Hurricanes is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Carolina Hurricanes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
68%Carolina Hurricanes (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,623
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.7%13.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos