Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carbon Sequestration results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 917 hits . Analysis detected 6,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,004 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,032 of 37,536 keywords). This Carbon Sequestration is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Carbon Sequestration
Keyword details
Total words: 11,004
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst