Keyword summary
40% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carbon Capture results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 2,585 hits . Analysis detected 18,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,054 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,137 of 36,718 keywords). This Carbon Capture is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Carbon Capture
Keyword details
Total words: 28,054
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles28.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
SFGate 81% 7/22/2026, 2:01:59 AM