Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellen Beshuk results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 496 hits . Analysis detected 2,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,743 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,818 of 6,244 authors). This Ellen Beshuk is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Ellen Beshuk
Author details
Total words: 2,743
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst