Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos5,650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canter's Deli results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 5,075 hits. Analysis detected 18,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,724 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,242 of 35,648 keywords). This Canter's Deli is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Canter's Deli
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
55%Canter's Deli (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,724
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 32.3%32.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 24.0%24.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 32.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos