Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camilla The Queen Consort results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 928 hits. Analysis detected 6,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,136 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (28,467 of 37,536 keywords). This Camilla The Queen Consort is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Camilla The Queen Consort
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,136
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos