Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Calmatters results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,035 hits . Analysis detected 9,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,263 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,041 of 37,168 keywords). This Calmatters is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Calmatters
Keyword details
Total words: 11,263
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst