Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brothers To The Rescue results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,293 hits. Analysis detected 8,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,173 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,887 of 37,536 keywords). This Brothers To The Rescue is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Brothers To The Rescue
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
13%Brothers To The Rescue (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

12% percentile
025507510012.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate