Keyword summary
90% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Carr results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,492 hits . Analysis detected 14,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,818 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,702 of 36,755 keywords). This Brendan Carr is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Brendan Carr
Keyword details
Total words: 8,818
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst