Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bonnie Tyler results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 970 hits. Analysis detected 4,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,608 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (34,403 of 35,816 keywords). This Bonnie Tyler is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Bonnie Tyler
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
4%Bonnie Tyler (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos