Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jon Blistein results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anchoring Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 545 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,596 authors). This Jon Blistein is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jon Blistein
Author details
Total words: 3,190
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 5.1% 5.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst