Keyword summary
98%2 analyzed articles/videos2,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blue Labour results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 1,563 hits. Analysis detected 9,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,117 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,067 of 36,718 keywords). This Blue Labour is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Blue Labour
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
70%Blue Labour (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,117
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.6%25.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos