Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blue City Crime results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 1,073 hits. Analysis detected 6,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,675 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (14,394 of 35,675 keywords). This Blue City Crime is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Blue City Crime
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
60%Blue City Crime (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,675
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate