Keyword summary
37%4 analyzed articles/videos3,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Black Sea results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,487 hits. Analysis detected 10,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,172 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (26,824 of 34,755 keywords). This Black Sea is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Black Sea
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
23%Black Sea (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,172
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate