Keyword summary
45% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Black Bears results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,556 hits . Analysis detected 7,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,289 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (29,183 of 35,627 keywords). This Black Bears is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Black Bears
Keyword details
Total words: 10,289
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst