Keyword summary
47% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biological Sex results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,183 hits . Analysis detected 11,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,041 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,234 of 37,536 keywords). This Biological Sex is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Biological Sex
Keyword details
Total words: 10,041
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst