Christian Therapist Explains the Central Problem With ‘Gender-Affirming Care,’ and Presents a Solution 59%

By Tyler O'Neil0%

7/14/2026, 10:20:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 2,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 861 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (8,867 of 21,204 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the article peer group.

Kaley Chiles, the counselor who prevailed at the Supreme Court against a Colorado law restricting therapy for unwanted same-sex attraction and gender dysphoria, told the Daily Signal that the medical sector bypasses the rightful course of treatment when it comes to transgender issues. 
“We’re treating this issue in some special way that we don’t treat any other issues,” Chiles said in an interview Thursday. 
The Supreme Court in March ruled, 8-1, that Colorado’s law aiming to ban  conversion therapy  violated the Constitution by discriminating against Chiles’ viewpoint. 
Colorado’s Legislature responded by passing House Bill 26-1322 to allow survivors of “conversion therapy” to sue providers. 
Gov. 
Jared Polis, a Democrat, signed the bill on June 1. 
Chiles emphasized to the Daily Signal that psychotherapy is not merely about “affirming” a person’s feelings. 
Moving Beyond ‘Affirmation’ 
Artificial intelligence “has shown us that it’s not helpful to be constantly affirmed and validated,” Chiles told the Daily Signal . 
“Good counseling does not simply affirm and validate.” 
It involves “helping us stretch our perspective.” 
Speaking as a trauma therapist, she explained, “People have all kinds of beliefs that aren’t serving them. 
Like, ‘I’m not worthy.’ 
‘Nobody cares about me.’ 
‘My life is meaningless.’ 
‘Why not just kill myself? 
'” 
“If we were to affirm those things, that would feel odd,” the therapist said. 
“That’s not what we do.” 
While therapists don’t “impose our values,” to some degree, “all counseling is philosophical,” she said. 
“Ethically and existentially, we impose the value that, don’t kill yourself—and let’s help you do that. 
Let’s help you live a life worth living. 
Let’s help you find meaning. 
Let’s help you tolerate distress,” she explained. 
“We do that with trauma, addictions, all the things—and we just don’t do it with this one singular thing,” Chiles argued. 
A Contrast With ‘Gender-Affirming Care’ 
While many medical institutions have championed experimental medical interventions to make men appear female and vice versa—often euphemistically described as “gender-affirming care”—Chiles noted that “there is very weak—if not no—evidence that ‘gender-affirming care’ works.” 
The Department of Health and Human Services conducted a peer-reviewed study finding little evidence for positive impacts from sex-rejecting procedures for minors. 
Studies have suggested these interventions cause harm, from increased cancer risks to a higher risk of suicidal thoughts . 
A jury awarded a detransitioner $2 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit in February, and psychiatrists reportedly agreed to settle another detransitioner’s medical malpractice claim in January. 
Hospitals have distanced themselves from the Human Rights Campaign, a major transgender activist group that rates medical entities. 
Chiles warned that when doctors prescribe cross-sex hormones, “we’re playing with the entire endocrine system as though we are God, as though we have a comprehension of exactly how the endocrine system works, which is quite prideful.” 
She presented therapy as the better solution to address gender dysphoria—the painful and persistent condition of identifying with the gender opposite one’s sex. 
“I think there’s a conflation of feelings and reality,” she said. 
“When someone says, ‘I feel like I am the opposite sex,’ they’re expressing a feeling, an experience. 
They’re not expressing a biological reality—and for us to conflate the two is naturally disastrous.” 
“We treat eating disorders, addictions, even trauma—trauma treatment is essentially the process of invalidating your feelings,” the therapist explained. 
“Because your feelings are that ‘because I was in a car wreck, I shouldn’t drive again,’ ‘because I was molested by a male, men are bad,’ ‘because something bad happened in an enclosed space, I should never go into enclosed spaces. 
'” 
“Over the course of therapy, what you want is actually a full invalidation in thought, in feeling, in sensation, in experience, that the trauma response is true,” she explained. 
A Christian Motivation to Address Transgender Identity 
When asked about her motivation to help people address gender confusion, the therapist emphasized the importance of knowing our own limits. 
“My heart is to help people accept the reality that we’re living in—we all have limits,” Chiles said. 
“We see in parenting, kids who have parents who set limits are less anxious,” she noted. 
“God is a gracious God, that he gives us parameters and boundaries and limits. 
We are not here to create our own meaning, we’re not here to be our own savior.” 
“We don’t have to bear the weight of the questions we’re not meant to bear,” the therapist explained. 
“Things like, ‘What is my identity?’ 
or ‘What sex am I?’ 
Those are just questions that we don’t have to bear, because the answer is given in our own bodies.” 
Chiles concluded by urging Christians to educate their children about biological sex. 
“We would start at age 2 or 3, not with what sex is, but that you are a sex, that you are a boy or you are a girl, you are made in the image of God, who doesn’t make mistakes,” she explained. 
She urged Christians to be “more proactive,” rather than reactive to the threat of transgender ideology in the world. 
“If we don’t sex educate our children, then it’s very clear that someone else will,” she warned. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Tyler O'Neil: 3.5%Daily Signal: 6.2%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.1%Daily Signal: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%Tyler O'Neil: 5.7%Daily Signal: 3.1%Availability Heuristic16.7%This article: 2.2%Tyler O'Neil: 0.4%Daily Signal: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic2.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.9%Daily Signal: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Tyler O'Neil: 7.0%Daily Signal: 8.5%Framing Effect13.1%This article: 2.2%Tyler O'Neil: 0.4%Daily Signal: 0.7%Loss Aversion2.2%This article: 2.2%Tyler O'Neil: 0.4%Daily Signal: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Tyler O'Neil: 1.8%Daily Signal: 1.2%Optimism Bias5.0%This article: 7.7%Tyler O'Neil: 1.6%Daily Signal: 1.3%Pessimism Bias7.7%This article: 23.2%Tyler O'Neil: 6.1%Daily Signal: 9.1%Negativity Bias23.2%This article: 2.1%Tyler O'Neil: 0.4%Daily Signal: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 1.7%Tyler O'Neil: 0.4%Daily Signal: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Tyler O'Neil: 3.7%Daily Signal: 3.4%In-Group Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Tyler O'Neil: 5.7%Daily Signal: 2.3%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.3%Daily Signal: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Tyler O'Neil: 1.2%Daily Signal: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Tyler O'Neil: 0.4%Daily Signal: 3.4%Ad Hominem2.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 1.2%Daily Signal: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 25.4%Tyler O'Neil: 9.8%Daily Signal: 4.6%Appeal to Authority25.4%This article: 16.0%Tyler O'Neil: 4.8%Daily Signal: 2.8%False Dilemma16.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.3%Tyler O'Neil: 8.4%Daily Signal: 9.4%Hasty Generalization4.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.8%Tyler O'Neil: 5.7%Daily Signal: 7.2%Appeal to Emotion16.8%This article: 2.3%Tyler O'Neil: 2.1%Daily Signal: 2.2%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 5.1%Tyler O'Neil: 1.0%Daily Signal: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 1.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 6.7%Tyler O'Neil: 1.4%Daily Signal: 0.2%Appeal to Nature6.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.1%Tyler O'Neil: 3.8%Daily Signal: 2.5%Anecdotal10.1%This article: 2.2%Tyler O'Neil: 0.4%Daily Signal: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.2%This article: 15.2%Tyler O'Neil: 3.1%Daily Signal: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.8%Tyler O'Neil: 1.6%Daily Signal: 2.7%Unattributed Quote7.8%This article: 2.4%Tyler O'Neil: 0.5%Daily Signal: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.8%Daily Signal: 9.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 24.2%Tyler O'Neil: 7.5%Daily Signal: 3.9%Indoctrination24.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.3%Daily Signal: 10.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler O'Neil: 0.0%Daily Signal: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

861 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker74%attributed speech223writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 21 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 5 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 37 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 15 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 21 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 18 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 14 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 17 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 18 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 6 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 5 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 43 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 19 words • 100.0% coverageKaley Chiles • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kaley Chiles

91%flagged-word coverage
638 attributed words100% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination+25.3 ptsWriter: 5.4%Kaley Chiles: 30.7%30.7%Unattributed Quote-17.3 ptsWriter: 20.6%Kaley Chiles: 3.3%3.3%Quote-first Misdirection+3.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kaley Chiles: 3.3%3.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.