Keyword summary
26% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barcelona results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,696 hits . Analysis detected 10,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,058 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (33,862 of 36,715 keywords). This Barcelona is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Barcelona
Keyword details
Total words: 18,058
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst