Keyword summary
⁠37%4 analyzed articles/videos4,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artemis Program results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,313 hits. Analysis detected 5,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,207 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,949 of 37,536 keywords). This Artemis Program is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Artemis Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠5%Artemis Program (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos