Author summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video1,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Harwood results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (4,398 of 6,628 authors). This William Harwood is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
William Harwood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠34%William Harwood (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos