Keyword summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos2,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Art Institute Of Chicago results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 3,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,283 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (34,785 of 37,536 keywords). This Art Institute Of Chicago is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Art Institute Of Chicago
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,283
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751007.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos