Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antarctica results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,675 hits. Analysis detected 7,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,760 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,438 of 37,536 keywords). This Antarctica is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Antarctica
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
17%Antarctica (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,760
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510016.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos