Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amphibians results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Overconfidence Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,719 hits . Analysis detected 7,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,296 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,290 of 37,536 keywords). This Amphibians is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Amphibians
Keyword details
Total words: 11,296
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst