Keyword summary
52% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amnesty International results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,529 hits . Analysis detected 15,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,346 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,947 of 37,536 keywords). This Amnesty International is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Amnesty International
Keyword details
Total words: 14,346
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst