Keyword summary
31% 2 analyzed articles/videos 907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allahu Akbar results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 201 hits . Analysis detected 1,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,721 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,416 of 37,536 keywords). This Allahu Akbar is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Allahu Akbar
Keyword details
Total words: 2,721
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst