Keyword summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Risks results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 714 hits . Analysis detected 3,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,308 of 37,536 keywords). This AI Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. AI Risks
Keyword details
Total words: 2,708
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 26.4% 26.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst