Keyword summary
89% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Spanberger results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 3,481 hits . Analysis detected 29,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,965 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (16,839 of 35,303 keywords). This Abigail Spanberger is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Abigail Spanberger
Keyword details
Total words: 19,965
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles20K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst