Keyword summary
42%4 analyzed articles/videos1,510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 86 47 results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,195 hits. Analysis detected 9,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,144 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (28,228 of 34,833 keywords). This 86 47 is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
86 47
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
19%86 47 (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,144
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate