Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Zazie Todd Ph.D. results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 687 hits . Analysis detected 2,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Zazie Todd Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Zazie Todd Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 3,704
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 18.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst