Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Xueer Lu results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 144 hits . Analysis detected 716 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Xueer Lu is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Xueer Lu
Author details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst