Author summary
12% 1 analyzed article/video 1,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WPR staff results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 510 hits . Analysis detected 1,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,431 of 9,392 authors). This WPR staff is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. WPR staff
Author details
Total words: 5,212
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst