Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 1,466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wm. Steven Humphrey results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 2,058 hits . Analysis detected 7,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,727 of 9,358 authors). This Wm. Steven Humphrey is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Wm. Steven Humphrey
Author details
Total words: 5,864
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.6% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 35.1% 35.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.7% 14.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 14.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst