Author summary
73%1 analyzed article/video1,466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wm. Steven Humphrey results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 2,058 hits. Analysis detected 7,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,727 of 9,358 authors). This Wm. Steven Humphrey is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Wm. Steven Humphrey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
82%Wm. Steven Humphrey (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,864
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 14.7%14.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Author 14.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate