Author summary
23%2 analyzed articles/videos169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria A. Ifatusin results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 674 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,783 of 8,871 authors). This Victoria A. Ifatusin is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Victoria A. Ifatusin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
35%Victoria A. Ifatusin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,672
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos