Author summary
12% 1 analyzed article/video 800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler King results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 182 hits . Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,804 of 9,026 authors). This Tyler King is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. Tyler King
Author details
Total words: 3,200
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst