Author summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Sorel results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 320 hits . Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,977 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,099 of 6,603 authors). This Tom Sorel is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Tom Sorel
Author details
Total words: 1,977
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 16.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Author 9.8%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst