Author summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Martinez results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 1,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (4,625 of 8,791 authors). This Tim Martinez is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Tim Martinez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠48%Tim Martinez (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,808
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos