Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Chan results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 1,099 hits . Analysis detected 2,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,412 of 6,628 authors). This Tim Chan is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Tim Chan
Author details
Total words: 2,680
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.7% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 41.0% 41.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.2% 6.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 41.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst