Author summary
5% 1 analyzed article/video 1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Ohio Capital Journal results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 148 hits . Analysis detected 969 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,053 of 8,599 authors). This The Ohio Capital Journal is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. The Ohio Capital Journal
Author details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst