Author summary
72%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New York Daily News results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 421 faulty-reasoning hits from 316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of 100% (60 of 8,792 authors). This The New York Daily News is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
The New York Daily News
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%The New York Daily News (selected)23%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 316
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

99% percentile
025507510099.3% percentile
22.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles316 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 31.0%31.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 24.7%24.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 34.2%34.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.7%18.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 34.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 18.7%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 24.7%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 12.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos