Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New Lede results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 3,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,467 of 9,307 authors). This The New Lede is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. The New Lede
Author details
Total words: 5,304
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst